I follow a blog called A Woman's Place and she directed me to a blog that just made me shake my head. As a run down, this Catholic woman doesn't like the public displays of affection between gay people because she wants to keep her children innocent for awhile longer. While I don't agree with everything the woman is saying in this blog, because I probably would have used the moment as a teachable moment had my (future) children asked, she absolutely doesn't deserve the onslaught of hatred that she is getting in the comments. People are calling her a c--- and a b---- and saying that she is a bigot and intolerant.
But my question is: when did tolerance become a virtue? When did tolerance become something to strive for in itself? I looked up "tolerance" in the dictionary and came up with these definitions:
tol·er·anceIn synonyms it had things like compassion, understanding and benevolence. The word that gets me in that definition is the word "permissive". I understand that people can do what they want, but I don't have to approve of it. But that word seems to imply that I need to approve of what people do, regardless of what I believe is true.
noun
- a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward those whose opinions, practices, race, religion, nationality, etc.,differ from one's own; freedom from bigotry.
- a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward opinions and practices that differ from one's own.
- interest in and concern for ideas, opinions, practices, etc.,foreign to one's own; a liberal, undogmatic viewpoint.
- the act or capacity of enduring; endurance.
This is something I ran into a lot in my Education Ethics class as well, where many of my fellow students were saying that we need to teach and foster a tolerant environment. But people seem to confuse treating all with dignity and respect with supporting everything that a person does. I can love somebody and not approve of what they do. Also, I find a lot of the time religious people are called to be more tolerant, while the tolerance towards religious beliefs becomes less.
In my ethics class we studied a case where a teacher was suspended for one month for writing into a newspaper the Church's beliefs of homosexuality. He said that "gay sex is inherently disordered, gay sex is risky, and gay sex is a sin." All three are true. The purpose of sex is twofold: to unite two people into one flesh in marriage, and to procreate. Gay sex cannot do this--it goes against the purpose of sex so it is disordered. As for the risk factor, STDs are still the highest among gay people, as well as anal cancer among those who participate in sodomy. Gay sex separates you from God. A woman in my class called this hate speech. There is nothing hateful about it. The teacher was not saying that gay people are evil people, but called the actions they partook in immoral and risky. He was not hateful, he did not say that we should tar and feather gay people, but merely pointed out that they make some choices which, although our society likes to say there is nothing wrong with them, they are indeed wrong.
Tolerance is a way to work around all the different beliefs of people. I will tolerate the beliefs of people, I will treat them with the respect and dignity they deserve. But I will not pretend to support or approve something which I believe to be wrong.